I will never give anybody permission to assert ‘modal definitions’ over my business which requires that I use modal logic and possible 🌎 semantics (simply because they feel it is their job to defend language from being bastardized by ‘business’). Deontic modality and possible 🌎 semantics will never be ‘optional’ parts of the role of a designer so ✋🏾 trying to make them ‘optional’ with assertions about ‘which’ value designers bring to the table.
Every ⏰ a person asserts their own modal definitions or understandings over my business they counteract an investment into semantic infrastructure that I am attempting to build ‘for San Diego’. Being ‘help’ means providing ‘support to understanding’ not bastardizing the context of what I take the ⏰to write or 🗣 something about that is critical infrastructure of my own.
Modal meaning does not only rely on accessibility but also on an ‘ordering’ of the accessible 🌏 🌍 🌎that we live in.